Evidently Metropolitan JONAH's apology on Great and Holy Friday was insufficient for some in the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese.
In Christ,
+Fr Gregory
April 22, 2009
+Bright Wednesday
Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you,
and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for my sake.
Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward
in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
(Matthew 5:11-12)
Dearly Beloved in the Lord,
Christos Anesti!
The Church of Constantinople, tracing her apostolic roots back to St. Andrew the First Called of the Apostles, continues to preserve the integrity and sanctity of our Christian Orthodox Church. The apostolicity of the Throne of Constantinople is further acknowledged by the historical fact that the Apostle and Evangelist John preached in Asia Minor.
For over 2000 years, faithful Orthodox Christians have kept the Church in Constantinople alive. This is especially true of the last 556 years, since the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans. Each day the faithful of the Ecumenical Throne, both clergy and laity, live their lives witnessing to our precious Faith in a Muslim world. Their world is one of sacrifice and persecution that comes from outside the Church.
Recently, we have been saddened by a homily given by Metropolitan Jonah of the Orthodox Church in America (formerly known as the Russian Metropolia). In his speech, Metropolitan Jonah attacks the Ecumenical Patriarchate and, in reality, all the ancient Patriarchates, calling them “Old World.” The Metropolitan ignores the canonical and ecclesiological understanding of that which is recognized in the diptychs of all canonical Orthodox Churches, namely, that the Ecumenical Patriarch is the first to be commemorated. Whether Metropolitan Jonah realized it or not, his words were an attack on the apostolic succession, which is derived through the ancient Patriarchates.
The 28th canon of the Fourth Ecumenical Council, which convened in Chalcedon, not only affirmed, but completed that which had been understood by the Second Ecumenical Council, namely, that the Ecumenical Throne was granted “equal privileges as those of the Church of Rome.” To this day, for example, only the Ecumenical Patriarchate possesses the ecclesiastical authority to act judicially in the appeal process regarding clergy outside its jurisdiction (Canons 9 and 17).
Moreover, the spiritual authority of the Ecumenical Patriarch is not “papal” in its expression, spiritually or administratively. To say so is an argument without understanding of Christian Orthodox ecclesiology. One must remember that the Ecumenical Throne has jurisdiction over the Church in many countries throughout the world. Along with the land of modern-day Turkey, the Patriarch of Constantinople oversees the work of the Holy Gospel in Northern Greece, Mt. Athos, the Islands of the Dodecanese, Crete, Australia, Great Britain, Western Europe, Southeast Asia, Albania, Carpatho-Russia, and the Western Hemisphere (especially among the Greek Orthodox and the Ukrainian Orthodox Churches). There may be contention from other jurisdictions challenging the responsibilities of the Ecumenical Throne—although these responsibilities are supported in Canon Law—but it supports the same pretext of the Turkish government.
Metropolitan Jonah, despite a weak attempt to reinterpret his statements, has shown us that the Ecumenical Patriarchate must now concern itself not only with attacks by those outside the Church, but also from within the Church, as well. It seems that the Metropolitan has ignored the fact that today’s world is moving towards globalization in every aspect of life, as evident in our ability to communicate with one another instantly.
I appeal to Metropolitan Jonah to reconsider his position, especially during this holy season, as we celebrate the Lord’s Resurrection, and come forth with a sincere apology to our Mother Church of Constantinople.
I beseech all God-loving Orthodox Christians to realize that we are all the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. This unity is expressed by the truth that we all partake of the precious Body and Blood of our Lord God and Savior Jesus Christ. As a Eucharistic community, we offer the prayer of the Holy Anaphora during the Divine Liturgy of St. Basil the Great, “…unite us all to one another who become partakers of the one Bread and the Cup in the communion of the one Holy Spirit. Grant that none of us may partake of the holy Body and Blood of your Christ to judgment or condemnation, but that we may find mercy and grace with all the saints, who through the ages have pleased You: forefathers, fathers, patriarchs, prophets, apostles, preachers, evangelists, martyrs, confessors, teachers, and every righteous spirit made perfect in faith.”
With Love in the Risen Lord,
+Metropolitan Gerasimos of San Francisco
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6f0c25b8-4ed1-41ce-a3c3-bf6dc0deb7d4)
This saddens me.
ReplyDeleteFirst, Met. Jonah's words were a direct response to an aggressive character assassination by a representative of the Phanar. I thought his homily was characterized by tremendous humility given the absurdity of the accusations leveled against him. And though Met. Jonah referred to the Patriarchs as part of the 'old world' this was hardly an attack on them - if anything, one could likewise pick at the Phanar's use of the terms "barbarian" and "diaspora" and say that, in essence, the Phanar is belittling the Christianity of those of us who live in America.
I think Met Jonah's main point was to say that Orthodoxy exists here, is unique from Orthodoxy in other cultures while still retaining the fullness of the faith, and that North American Orthodoxy needs to be governed by its own hierarchs and not foreign ones.
He did appologize for the offensive portions of his homily - as Christians, that ought to be forgiven, and the intent of his homily - which was pure Orthodoxy - should be celebrated.
I mean, what did the Phanar expect?? For the (funtionally) autocephalous OCA to roll over and submit because of a very very suspect interpretation of canon 28 that depends on calling all American Orthodox Christians "barbarians" in "diaspora?"
Forgive me,
Macarius
Macarius,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I think your point is well taken--His Beatitude is responding to provocation (which does not justify his own tone).
The larger point, that the Church in America exists in its own, unique, cultural context is also right on target (I almost said "money"! A rather unique Americanism). Having served as a priest in the GOA for 12 years (I'm now in the OCA), I know that I often simply didn't get what was going on for my Greek parishioners. (Though truth be told, I often got on better with Greek immigrants than Greek-Americans. But that's another story).
Does the cultural difference mean that the Church in American cannot be under the EP? No, of course not--but what this current kurflufle does suggest (to me at least) is that there needs to be a great deal more work--on both sides of the Atlantic--if we are going to understand (tto say nothing of LOVE) each other.
On this point I think we would do well to look at the challenges faced by our Catholic brothers and sisters as they work out being an American Church with a European Pope. Not that they've done things perfectly, but it is a good place to start.
Following from this last point, I do think that in the last 20 years or so the Orthodox in America have focused too much of our attention on making Orthodox understandable & attractive to Protestant & Evangelical Christians. While I appreciate why we have done so, got to say, I think it was a mistake. I say this not to suggest that we shoudn't welcome converts from Protestantism--rather I think--as has the Catholic Church in America--our outreach has been unwise and (potentially) harmful to the life of the Church.
In Christ,
+FrG